|
The Surgical High Dependency Unit.
Rachel Barlow.
Abstract: an overview of the development of the surgical high dependency unit at The Royal London Hospital. 4 references.
Contents Historical Background. High Dependency Care. Project Group. Staff development. Patient caseload. The future. Conclusion. References.
Return to Nursing Progress contents list Back to Issue 10 contents list
Historical Background
High dependency care is not a new concept. Perhaps the first reference to high dependency care was in 1852 when Florence Nightingale wrote 'It is valuable to have one place where post operative and other patients requiring close attention can be watched'. (1) During the 1940s post operative recovery rooms were introduced, providing care to highly dependent patients. The 1950s saw the establishment of intensive care units following the use of intermittent positive pressure ventilation during the epidemic of poliomyelitis.
As technology developed and monitoring became more sophisticated the rapid development of intensive care units somewhat overshadowed the development of formal high dependency units. Over the years highly dependent patients have been cared for in many areas within the hospital setting, including intensive care and acute ward areas with an increased nurse: patient ratio.
The 1980s was a time when specialised high-dependency areas were developed sporadically, whilst intensive care units were advancing their capacity with technological, medical and nursing advances. Ten years later the demand for critical care had escalated to levels that resulted in patients being transferred from one hospital to another because of a shortage of critical care beds. (2)
Back to contents
High Dependency Care
It remains difficult to distinguish between intensive care, high dependency care and care provided on wards, as services will differ from hospital to hospital. The general agreement is that high dependency care does fall between the level of care which can be provided in intensive care and on the wards.
In a review of adult critical care services by a National Expert Group in 1999, the Department of Health published a paper in which classifications were identified, focusing on the level of care that individual patients need (figure 1).(3) The provision of high dependency care or level 2 care is recommended in all hospitals where elective surgery is carried out.
Back to contents
Figure 1: Classification of levels of care
|
Level 0 |
Patients whose needs must be met through normal care in an acute hospital |
|
Level 1 |
Patients at risk of their condition deteriorating, or those recently relocated from higher levels of care, whose needs can be met on an acute ward with additional advice and support from the critical care team. |
|
Level 2 |
Patients requiring more detailed observation or intervention including support for a single failing organ system or post operative care or those 'stepping down' from higher levels of care. |
|
Level 3 |
Patients requiring advanced respiratory support alone or basic support together with support for at least 2 organ systems. This level includes all complex patients requiring support for multi-organ failure. |
|
Back to contents
Project Group
In June 2000, following the recommendations by the Department of Health, a project group was formed to plan and set up a surgical high dependency unit at The Royal London Hospital. The group was led by the Heads of Nursing and consisted of nursing representatives from all wards within the Surgical and Muscoskeletal directorate, the Acting General Manager, anaesthetic and surgical consultant representatives, physiotherapists and pharmacists and a medical technical officer. Valuable contributions were made by A & E and ITU staff and the Patient at Risk Nurse Consultant.
In order to provide a high dependency service, access to experienced and suitably trained staff from a multidisciplinary team is necessary, with resources to assist in providing such a level of care. As refurbishment work commenced on Harrison ward, costings for the project were prepared and taken to the Critical Care Board. An inventory of equipment was agreed and ordered. Equipment needs will vary from one high dependency unit to another, depending on the type and speciality of patients the service is aimed at. The main expenditure necessary is for a monitoring system to meet the patients needs on and off the unit when transferred. Other expenses included humidification circuits, re-warming devices and emergency equipment including a transport ventilator.
Back to contents
Nursing activity on a high dependency unit will be predictably more costly than a ward area. It is recommended that there is a nurse to patient ratio of 1:2 in HDU areas. Skill mix also needs to be considered to ensure safe and quality care is provided and training and development available to all grades of clinical staff. With an agreed nursing establishment, job descriptions were written and initial recruitment was led by the Heads of Nursing, with the assistance of nursing staff across the directorate. Members of the project group visited other high dependency units. The medical management for high dependency patients was debated and operational issues discussed within the project group. This resulted in an agreed operational policy that patients would remain under the management of a surgical consultant whilst in the high dependency unit and included specific admission criteria.
Back to contents
Staff development
In order to provide a quality service in a clinical area, it is imperative that staff are developed and supported. Most nursing staff commenced work a month before the HDU opened. With the challenge of developing the nurses ability to care for highly dependant patients in a relatively short period of time, work books were used as a theoretical learning resource for staff starting in a new speciality. High-dependency study days and daily teaching introduced new skills and developed staffs existing knowledge. Since the unit has opened there continues to be a structured teaching programme. More recently the HDU hosted a national open and study day. Case presentations were incorporated into lectures and presented by members of the HDU team. There were a large number of external visitors from across the country, and the day was deemed a success.
In a new and demanding environment the need for a positive and productive learning environment is important. All staff have quarterly personal development plan meetings with a preceptor. A resource of learning materials is being built up. More recently a competency based development programme has been introduced for staff in the HDU. Outside of the unit good relationships are being developed with City University School of Nursing and Midwifery who run an ENB course in High Dependency Nursing. Senior nursing staff from the unit will be teaching on future courses and for the first time all candidates on the course will have an opportunity to work in a designated high dependency area with clinical tutors.
Back to contents
Patient caseload
Since the opening of the high dependency unit the patient caseload has been audited using the East London Region Intensive Care audit tool. (4) Data was collected from 112 patients by the end of February 2001 Typically 50% of patients admitted to the unit are general surgical patients. Vascular surgery makes up a majority of the elective workload, and 17% of the emergency admissions to the HDU are under the vascular surgeons. Notably since the provision of high dependency care at The Royal London Hospital, there has been a reduction in the cancellation of surgery for lack of critical care beds. Our emergency admissions predictably include a large amount of trauma as well as 'in house' emergencies including patients who require respiratory support and management of sepsis leading to interventions including inotropic support.
With patients' length of stay on HDU ranging from 1-13 days, the average length of stay is 2 days. Most patients (88%) are discharged to the wards from the HDU. Only 7% of patients have been transferred to the intensive care unit. Mortality on the unit is 3.5%. At the end of February 64% of patients admitted to the HDU since December were discharged home from hospital. The remaining patients (24%) were reportedly recovering well on wards.
Back to contents
The future
Project work currently in progress by the nursing staff on HDU includes the development of local policies and guidelines for care. A review of documentation including assessment tools and care planning is currently under way. To compliment the existing development for staff, there will be a programme of study days on High Dependency care for nursing staff this summer. As recruitment continues after the success of the national open day, the unit will soon be opening more beds. Working with the senior nurses and Heads of Nursing from the directorate, opportunities are being explored for rotational programmes for nursing staff.
Back to contents
Conclusion
The high dependency unit is part of a hospital wide approach to critical care. The unit is a resource that supports and interacts with a range of departments and personnel across the Trust. Many of those people were involved in the design and initial planning of the unit as well as the recruitment of staff. To all those people including the Special Trustees who made available generous funding for the rebuilding of the HDU, we would like to extend our thanks. In the future the unit looks forward to the challenge of providing a level of critical care to surgical patients at The Royal London.
Back to contents
References
1. Jennett B. Is intensive care worthwhile? Care of the Critically Ill 1990; 6.3: 85—8.
2. Sheppard M. High Dependency Nursing, Ballilere TindallI/ RCN 2000.
3. Department of Health. Comprehensive Critical Care: A Review of Adult Critical Care Services. 1999.
4. East London Region Intensive Care Audit; December 2000 - February 2001.
Nursing Progress: Issue 10: June 2001.
Copyright: Nursing Progress, Royal Hospitals NHS Trust
Return to Nursing Progress contents list
Back to Issue 10 contents list
Back to Top
Page last updated by DEB on 1/7/02 |